|
PRINT: ISSN 2221-1896
ONLINE : ISSN 2223-0343
|
|
|
Comparison of enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay, fluorescence assay and indirect immunofluorescence
assay in detection
of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup
J in DF1 cells |
|
Peng Zhao1#, Wenchao Zhuo1#, Chunhua Qi2#,
Dongjie Cai1, Mingchao Liu1*, Huijun Guo1,
Jianzhu Liu1*
and Zhizhong Cui1
|
1College
of Veterinary Medicine, Research Center for Animal Disease Control
Engineering Shandong Province, Shandong
Agricultural University, Tai`an 271018,
China; 2Central
Hospital of Tai’an City, Tai’an, Shandong,
271018, China
|
|
Abstract |
The levels of immunofluorescence
assay (FA), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the dynamic detection of the avian
leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J)
into DF1 cells were compared and evaluated. The rNX0101 strain of ALV-J
was inoculated into DF-1 cells at three different concentrations (1×102,
1×103, 1×104 TCID50). Results showed
that with ELISA, the rNX0101 strain was first detected on the 3rd
day at a concentration of 1×102 TCID50 and on the
first day at concentrations of 1×103 and 1×104
TCID50. FA failed to detect the positive cells until the 3rd
day after inoculation at a concentration of 1×102 TCID50.
IFA detected the positive cells in the culture at all concentrations
from the 1st day to the 6th day, except for the 1st
day, when used at a concentration of 1×102 TCID50.
The ratios of the positively infected cells highly
conformed to the trend in inoculation concentration on the same days,
and IFA exhibited higher sensitivity than did FA and ELISA in the
dynamic detection of ALV-J.
|
Keywords:
Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J; ELISA; FA; IFA |
|
To cite this article:
Zhao P, W Zhuo, C Qi, D Cai, M Liu, H Guo, J Liu and
Z Cui,
2014.
Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fluorescence assay and
indirect immunofluorescence assay in detection of Avian Leukosis Virus
Subgroup J in DF1 cells.
Res.
Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(1), 19-23. |
|
|